Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]

On 6 Mar 2011, at 14:40, Nathan wrote:
>> My concern isn't all that much about graph literals, although I don't see the evidence for them being needed.
> 
> Cool, okay - do you know of any problems that may be caused by including them?

Like any feature, it adds cost for implementors.

Best,
Richard



> 
> Cheers, Nathan
> 

Received on Sunday, 6 March 2011 15:26:54 UTC