Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs] from Nathan on 2011-03-04 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from March 2011)

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:45:33 +0000
To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4D71799D.3020303@webr3.org>

RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]

yes, a main reason being, if we don't, somebody else will, and possibly 
a few different people, which would lead to interop problems and require 
standardization in the future. So may as well get there first.

Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 23:46:46 UTC