Re: [Turtle] Re: bang ! in turtle

On Mar 2, 2011, at 16:05 , Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> 
>>> caveat: super-turtle is needed also
> 
> I looooove that name.   We have to do this, just so we can use that
> name.  :-)
> 

:-)

>> That is not clear to me either. We probably need something like TrIG if we find the right ways for the graph identification, and we would probably give it a different name and a different media type to differentiate it from Turtle. But I would advocate for the absolute minimum changes necessary for graph identification.
> 
> Why the "absolute minimum change"?   Why not add some nice little
> features, time permitting?
> 

Because I want to keep the simplicity of Turtle which is one of its main selling point (for me). I am afraid of us getting into a geeky-engineering cycle that would kill that...

Ivan


>> As I said before, alas, the rule part of n3 is _not_ in our charter, ie, we should not do that. This should be done in a RIF related group to reconcile it with RIF semantics and, unfortunately, we do not have the manpower for that at this moment...
> 
> Indeed.  
> 
>   -- Sandro
> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf