W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral?

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:39:19 +0100
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0D89CC1E-C9BC-4EBF-A7DD-B02A49425BF2@cyganiak.de>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
On 20 Jun 2011, at 15:20, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> my main hope is that other documents (i.e. SPARQL) that refer to the term "plain literal" will automagically adopt the new meaning once the new RDF documents are published.

I understand.

Let's pick this discussion up again when the RDF Concepts editors have proposed concrete words.

Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 14:39:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:59 UTC