W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral?

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:20:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4DFF5737.3030603@thefigtrees.net>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 6/20/2011 7:31 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 19 Jun 2011, at 18:48, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> Richard, do you see any way to implement the recent resolution
>> without removing the term "plain literal" from the abstract
>> syntax?
> When you say “abstract syntax”, do you mean “abstract syntax” or “the
> RDF 1.1 Concepts document”?

I guess I mean the latter -- my main hope is that other documents (i.e. 
SPARQL) that refer to the term "plain literal" will automagically adopt 
the new meaning once the new RDF documents are published.


> The resolution *has* removed plain literals without language tags
> from the abstract syntax. It does not affect plain literals with
> language tags; but let's see what the WG resolves to do about these.
> Richard
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 14:21:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:59 UTC