W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral?

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:08:53 +0100
Message-ID: <4DFF0015.30107@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org

On 19/06/11 18:35, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> Given that the term “plain literal” is likely to be removed from the abstract syntax,

Plain literals have a lexical form and optionally a language tag

Plain literals are not being removed from the abstract syntax.

We *may* wish to change terminology when we have decided what to do 
about language tags but I think the terminology is out there and well 
used so we should proceed with great caution.  The time for changing 
terminology just because it is "better" is long gone.

Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 08:09:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:59 UTC