W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2011

What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral?

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:35:18 +0100
Message-Id: <BAF2FC34-1F00-4DD1-A4F5-AD2F5CF4937A@cyganiak.de>
To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
A question to the team contacts.

Given that the term “plain literal” is likely to be removed from the abstract syntax, our work has a serious impact on the rdf:PlainLiteral specification.

Regarding W3C process, what are our options and/or duties regarding that spec?

Can we just ignore it?

Do we *have* to update it, given that it's sorta in RDF Core territory and we are making changes to its subject matter?

Does some other WG *have* to update it and do we need to work with them?

*Can* we even update it, if we want to?

Just trying to understand the space of possibilities.

Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 17:36:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:59 UTC