On 10 Jun 2011, at 16:03, Alex Hall wrote: > The only other one I can find is xsd:precisionDecimal, which I've added to the table. I believe this has been noted in the past as an at-risk feature. Ok. Assuming it stays in the spec, it would probably be useful in RDF too. > There is also a new special built-in type, xsd:anyAtomicType, which is the base type from which all atomic-valued types are derived. It's convenient because it explicitly excludes the sequence-valued types which don't fit in with the RDF datatype model, and might be worth mentioning in an informative note ("Only those datatypes derived from xsd:anyAtomicType should be used in RDF..."). Then again, it might just confuse the matter. It's an option. >> Are these XSD 1.1 questions an ISSUE in the tracker yet? > > No -- should they be? I think so, just to make sure that we have captured the issue and don't forget about it. > I don't know the process for raising issues. Go to http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/ and click “Issue » Create” in the sidebar. Anyone can raise issues. Best, RichardReceived on Friday, 10 June 2011 16:06:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:44 GMT