W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:05:24 +0100
Cc: antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <DA1E8061-E1C4-4755-A138-0F1081AA3E34@cyganiak.de>
To: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>
On 10 Jun 2011, at 16:03, Alex Hall wrote:
> The only other one I can find is xsd:precisionDecimal, which I've added to the table. I believe this has been noted in the past as an at-risk feature.

Ok. Assuming it stays in the spec, it would probably be useful in RDF too.

> There is also a new special built-in type, xsd:anyAtomicType, which is the base type from which all atomic-valued types are derived. It's convenient because it explicitly excludes the sequence-valued types which don't fit in with the RDF datatype model, and might be worth mentioning in an informative note ("Only those datatypes derived from xsd:anyAtomicType should be used in RDF..."). Then again, it might just confuse the matter.

It's an option.

>> Are these XSD 1.1 questions an ISSUE in the tracker yet?
> No -- should they be?

I think so, just to make sure that we have captured the issue and don't forget about it.

> I don't know the process for raising issues.

Go to http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/ and click “Issue » Create” in the sidebar. Anyone can raise issues.

Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 16:06:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:59 UTC