W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: ISSUE-59 - RDF/XML completeness

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:54:13 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=7JXTtSy91H5yW6W_FC9MfrhU7xA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 8 June 2011 17:49, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
<pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> Issue-59 talks about representing arbitrary graph structures in RDF/XML,
> but the trail leads back to a discussion of representing bnodes in
> RDF/XML, e.g.,
>        _:a1 <http://random.ioctl.org/#p1> _:a2 .
>        _:a2 <http://random.ioctl.org/#p2> _:a1 .

Yes, rdf:nodeID fixed this.

> not about the "usual" issue of triples whose predicate cannot be written
> as an XML entity name (or whatever the actual XML nomenclature really
> is).
>
> However, this is no longer a problem, because rdf:nodeID was added to
> RDF/XML.
>
>
> I think that the confusion here was that the WG thought that the problem
> was about the other RDF/XML inadequacy.
>
>
>
> So, I propose that we close ISSUE-59 as "Opened in error".

Sounds reasonable

Dan
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 15:54:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:44 GMT