W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Mercurial repository layout

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:45:38 +0200
Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CA87CCA9-1420-4464-9EF4-148862B4AC24@w3.org>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>

On Jun 2, 2011, at 17:34 , Dan Brickley wrote:

> On 2 June 2011 17:32, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> Richard,
>> my starting point is: whatever is good for the editors should be good for me. I am still not convinced that having our private copy of the script is necessary (the RDFa WG has worked with respec.js for almost two years now without doing this) and useful but, again, I do not feel like really arguing over that, not being an editor...
> Is there any mechanism for expression relations across Mercurial
> repositories that could help here? ie. ours referes to the respect.js
> repo, so when we do a checkout/clone/whateveritscalled it pulls in the
> latest of both?

recspec is under CVS :-(


> Dan

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2011 15:43:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:59 UTC