W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Mercurial repository layout

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:34:27 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimvQqjsGW=3i7tfXUUcu30DtcOzHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 2 June 2011 17:32, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Richard,
> my starting point is: whatever is good for the editors should be good for me. I am still not convinced that having our private copy of the script is necessary (the RDFa WG has worked with respec.js for almost two years now without doing this) and useful but, again, I do not feel like really arguing over that, not being an editor...

Is there any mechanism for expression relations across Mercurial
repositories that could help here? ie. ours referes to the respect.js
repo, so when we do a checkout/clone/whateveritscalled it pulls in the
latest of both?

Received on Thursday, 2 June 2011 15:34:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:59 UTC