W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Proposing new terms for g-snap and g-text

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:01:20 -0400
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1311174080.2599.124.camel@waldron>
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 10:55 -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> 
> > g-box: "RDF graph resource"?
> 
> -1 on "resource" -- in RDF, everything is a resource, certainly
> including g-snaps.
> 
> There's nothing I really like here, but I could live with "graph
> container" or "triplestore".

Maybe "single-graph store", which maybe fits with Pat's effort to
combine this with SPARQL's notion of "graph store" (which then perhaps
gets retronymed to "multi-graph store.)     Unfortunately, many people
have trouble thinking of an on-disk file as a "graph store"....

   - s
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 15:01:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:44 GMT