W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: [GRAPH] graph deadlock?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:51:26 -0500
Message-ID: <4EECD69E.6060907@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 12/17/11 12:21 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> That is why we are stuck. This situation cannot be resolved simply by letting it all hang out. We could simply declare that RDF has no semantics, and is simply to be used by programmers to mess around with in ways they find handy. Really, this might be the best way to move forward. But until we do this, we have to take the semantics seriously.

+1

This is the riddle, fundamentally.

RDF, SPARQL, and Linked Data (an optional application of SPARQL and RDF 
to the matter of InterWeb scale structured data via directed graphs) 
should be loosely coupled.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








Received on Saturday, 17 December 2011 17:52:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT