W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Graph-State Resources

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:50:34 -0500
Message-ID: <4EEBBD2A.6070206@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 12/16/11 3:56 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Kingsley,
>
> That isn't legal SPARQL 1.1 Update syntax.
>
> Specifically: INSERT INTO is SPARQL/Update submission syntax
> but the WG decided on something different.
>
> There's an (unofficial) validator at:
>
> http://sparql.org/update-validator.html
>
> which is running a parser derived from the same source as the spec 
> grammar.

We (OpenLink) are supposed to support legal SPARQL and our own dialects 
e.g. SPASQL (SPARQL inside SQL) :-)

Anyway, we'll get this syntax sugar matter sorted re. official SPARQL 
1.1 Update syntax.

Kingsley
>
>     Andy
>
> On 15/12/11 22:48, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> I embellished the data via following SPARQL.
>>
>> ## Web Semantics Ontology
>>
>> INSERT INTO <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log.rdf>
>> {?s rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#> .
>> <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#>
>> <http://open.vocab.org/terms/defines> ?s .
>> <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#> a owl:Ontology .
>> ?s <http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>
>> <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log.rdf>}
>> FROM <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log.rdf>
>> WHERE {?s a ?o  }
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 21:52:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT