- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:04:35 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 15/12/11 18:35, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> The existence of log:semantics at least lets us try to pose a question:
>
> Does log:semantics act as an owl:FunctionalProperty? i.e. within a
> single graph, can we expect at most one true property value for it?
>
> People seem to talk as if it is functional, but I can't see that
> working out in practice.
Documents can change over time.
"""The log:semantics of a document is the formula.
achieved by parsing representation of the document"""
includes the act of accessing the document to get the representation.
Passing on a log:semantics seems to imply passing on that act.
Merge two documents with two log:semantics assertions ...
"Graph" 1:
<http://example/temperature> log:semantics { :here :currentTemp 15 . }
"Graph" 2:
<http://example/temperature> log:semantics { :here :currentTemp 4 . }
so I think that's a "no", it's not an owl:FunctionalProperty.
Andy
(I tried to dereference log:Formula ...)
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 19:05:02 UTC