W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: New Draft of Turtle

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:14:11 +0000
Message-ID: <4EEA2AE3.2080802@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org


On 15/12/11 16:59, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> See
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2011Dec/0000.html
>
> The Redland parser has "%expect 2".

Sorry that may not be clear.

It says the parser generator should expect exactly 2 shift/reduce 
conflicts and not report anything if there are.

http://www.gnu.org/s/bison/manual/bison.html#Expect-Decl

>
>
> The grammar, as currently specified in the spec, is not LL(1).
>
> The SPARQL formulation does not require lookahead of greater than one.
> We (DAWG and non-DAWG members) spent quite a long time on tuning the
> grammar to work with minimal requirements.
>
> Andy
>
> On 13/12/11 20:41, Gavin Carothers wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> New Editors Draft of Turtle is up at the usual place
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html
>>
>> Included changes:
>>
>> Turtle in HTML
>> N-Prime (N-Triples)
>> Escapes in local part of Prefix Names
>> Grammar bugs
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gavin
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 17:14:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT