W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 14 Dec

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:05:27 -0600
Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Message-Id: <76553A3E-EA40-4E96-8170-96ABED704EEF@ihmc.us>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
There is an interesting discussion going on right now on public-rdf-dawg-comments under the subject line "Indirect Graph Identification" which may be relevant to our agenda. Thread starts at 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Nov/0048.html

Pat

On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:40 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:

> 
> On Dec 13, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> 
>> On 13 Dec 2011, at 20:54, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>>> The main thing we seem to be in limbo about is the GRAPHS debate. I suggest we devote the meeting to this theme. I have included in the agenda some discussion topics that came up in recent telecons, plus the email of Andy on TriG examples.  I suggest we also have a meta-discussion on what our options are for getting consensus.
>> 
>> I suggest a straw poll:
>> 
>> [[
>> PROPOSAL: Close all graph model+semantics issues by accepting the RDF Datasets design [1] as the data model, and by adding no new semantics.
>> ]]
>> 
> 
> But that design refers to 'named graphs', which already introduces new semantics (that is, semantics which goes beyond that defined in the RDF specs.) i would be delighted if we could agree to build named graph semantics into the RDF semantics. If that is what you are suggesting, then +1 from me. I wonder however if those who want to be free to use any IRI to, um, 'label' a graph in a triple store would be happy with this? (I was under the continuing impression that there was a consensus that this solution was unacceptable. Maybe this impression is now obsolete?)
> 
> Pat
> 
>> Knowing who can't live with this minimalist approach would be a form of progress IMO.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Richard
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-multigraph
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 05:08:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT