Hello RDF working group. Has there been consensus concerning deprecation of RDF containers in 1.1? Specifically, I am curious about the rdfs:member property. It is very useful for stating membership of something in a uniform way (unlike using rdf:_1, rdf:_2, ...) and in a single triple (unlike using rdf:first and rdf:rest). I am well aware of the distinction between containers and collections, but it seems that RDF really needs something as simple as rdfs:member. Please let me know. Thank you. Jesse Weaver Ph.D. Student, Patroon Fellow Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~weavej3/Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 11:47:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:44 GMT