W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: RDF-ISSUE-73: IRI_REF vs. IRIref [RDF Turtle]

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:51:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CANfjZH1PY2Ww73uG2i20jmnR20RUbhb4-Rs2RpUvvjqC9Bii_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Aug 12, 2011 6:19 AM, "RDF Working Group Issue Tracker" <
sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> RDF-ISSUE-73: IRI_REF vs. IRIref [RDF Turtle]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/73
>
> Raised by: Gavin Carothers
> On product: RDF Turtle
>
> Grammar should not use terms that are so close that the editor screwed
them up while writing a parser.

Heh, sorry.
There are only 60 productions in turtle;case variations of "IRIref" should
be sufficient to express the entire language.

Note that both productions come from SPARQL so this issue applies there as
well.
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 05:52:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:44 GMT