W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-text@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: getting to Last Call on rdf:text

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:35:35 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0903241235h7ef5768ehd25ce355df4a201a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-rdf-text@w3.org, team-rif-chairs@w3.org, team-owl-chairs@w3.org
>> Note 6.
>> Editor's Note: Open Issues: The inclusion of text-length, as well as
>> the definition of the function - whether the length of an rdf:text
>> value should concern only the string part - are still under
>> discussion.
>>
>> As this impinges on the namespace that is controlled by the XQuery WG
>> I suggest that we either ask them to define them or drop them.
>>
> I agree to drop this note from rdf:text.

Hi Jie,
The issue wasn't so much the note, but the actual definition of the functions
fn:text-length
fn:matches-language-range

These are functions that it appears the rdf:text spec defines, but
they are defined in the namespace that XQuery controls. So my
suggestion was either to coordinate with them, or to remove the
definitions of these functions.

-Alan

>
> Jie
>
>> -Alan
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> At the request of OWL-WG, RIF-WG just looked at
>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec with an eye
>>> to making a LC decision, but the draft is clearly not ready.  It has six
>>> editor's notes in it.
>>>
>>> Let's talk about those as necessary on this list, ASAP, to figure out
>>> how to get rid of them, and make any other necessary changes.
>>>
>>>     -- Sandro
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jie Bao
> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
>
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2009 19:36:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:42 UTC