>> Note 6. >> Editor's Note: Open Issues: The inclusion of text-length, as well as >> the definition of the function - whether the length of an rdf:text >> value should concern only the string part - are still under >> discussion. >> >> As this impinges on the namespace that is controlled by the XQuery WG >> I suggest that we either ask them to define them or drop them. >> > I agree to drop this note from rdf:text. Hi Jie, The issue wasn't so much the note, but the actual definition of the functions fn:text-length fn:matches-language-range These are functions that it appears the rdf:text spec defines, but they are defined in the namespace that XQuery controls. So my suggestion was either to coordinate with them, or to remove the definitions of these functions. -Alan > > Jie > >> -Alan >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: >>> >>> At the request of OWL-WG, RIF-WG just looked at >>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec with an eye >>> to making a LC decision, but the draft is clearly not ready. It has six >>> editor's notes in it. >>> >>> Let's talk about those as necessary on this list, ASAP, to figure out >>> how to get rid of them, and make any other necessary changes. >>> >>> -- Sandro >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Jie Bao > http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie >Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2009 19:36:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 March 2009 19:36:27 GMT