W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-text@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: Update Unicode reference for rdf:text

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:13:27 +0000
Message-ID: <4992F927.3010304@deri.org>
To: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
CC: "public-rdf-text@w3.org" <public-rdf-text@w3.org>, Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>

Jie Bao wrote:
> Hi Axel and Boris
> 
> As I didn't hear objection from you, I would go ahead and make the
> change to the wiki. Please let me know if you or others have comments.
> 
> Jie
> 
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu> wrote:
>> Axel:
>>
>> It was suggested at the OWL meeting we update the Unicode reference
>> for rdf:text with the following text. The main change is adding the
>> mention of a specific Unicode version.
>>
>> "Unicode The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Standard, Version  5.1.0,
>> ISBN 0-321-48091-0, as updated from time to time by the publication of
>> new versions. (See http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions
>> for the latest version and additional information on versions of the
>> standard and of the Unicode Character Database)."
>>
>> Will you be ok with this change?
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec
>>
>> Jie

hmmm, I have a question on that... e.g. on the lang-tags, we exlicitly 
refer to BPG-47 which is the "dynamic" link which always points to the 
latest version of the spec where here you seem to suggest just the opposite.

In that sense, I'm not 100% sure.
So, what is the ratonale of going to static version in one (unicode) and 
dynamic version in another case (lang tags)?

Axel

>> --
>> Jie
>> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, 
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 16:14:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:42 UTC