Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns

> Sorry, just repeating my comment with a better subject: line.
> I think this is going to be pretty important for TAG and director
> approval, so getting permission in advance from whoever's
> in charge of this URI would probably be a good idea.

Yeah, I'm not sure at which maturity we'll do it, but I'll find out.  CR
seems about right to me.  There's no particular permission needed; it's
one of the jobs of the team contact (ie me) to set up namespace
documents as needed.

Actually, I don't know what triples should go there for this.  Ideas?

      -- Sandro

> Jonathan
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
> Date: Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:08 AM
> Subject: Re: built-in naming in rdf:PlainLiteral
> To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
> Cc: public-rdf-text@w3.org, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
> 
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org> wrote:
> > We need to register the plfn: namespace, right?
> 
> Speaking of which, somebody is going to take care of coolifying the URI
> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#PlainLiteral , right? The
> ontology you get currently doesn't mention this URI.

Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 19:21:27 UTC