Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week

> "The results of matching SPARQL basic graph patterns in an entailment
> regime that understands rdf:text MUST provide variable bindings in
> existing RDF plain literal form." 
...
> The first is a direct statement and, to me, clearer.  A link to
> .../rdf-sparql-query/#sparqlBGPExtend would be good.

Okay, I added that, preceeded by a generalization which I hope is
correct and I hopt provides enough context for most of us to know what
it's talking about.  I trust you'll tell me if I got it wrong.  :-)

It's the new last paragraph of section 4:

    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PlainLiteral#Syntax_for_rdf:PlainLiteral_Literals
    
   -- Sandro

Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 20:38:59 UTC