Re: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text

Hi, this is mainly a question to the RIF/OWL chairs:

We never formally replied to Andy's comments, probably because there is 
no single formal WG in charge for rdf:text.

How shall we proceed on that?

Axel

Jie Bao wrote:
> Dear Andy Seaborne.
> 
> Thank you for your response. I incorporated them in the wiki-version
> of the rdf:text document. The version is at
> * http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=InternationalizedStringSpec&oldid=18720
> 
> The diff to the original document is:
> * http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=InternationalizedStringSpec&diff=18720&oldid=17905
> 
> I further made a few changes (details are given in the email) at
> * http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=InternationalizedStringSpec&oldid=18758
> 
> Those changes can be tracked at
> * http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=InternationalizedStringSpec&action=history
> 
> Please note this email only reflects my personal opinion. It’s not a
> formal working group response.
> 
> Please let me know whether or not you are satisfied with this response
> to your comment. I’m glad to have further discussions about any
> remaining issues.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jie



-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, 
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/