a few more editorial comments

A few more:

   *  in At Risk #3, I think you mean "rtfn:length" not "rdfn:compare"

   *  in At Risk #1, I don't quite understand what's at risk.  Is it the choice
      of namespaces?   Do you mean:

            "The selection of the rtfn 
            (http://www.w3.org/2009/rdf-text-functions) namespace
            may change, based on feedback that these functions should
            be merged into another namespace"

      That seems kind of problematic, since it's not a binary choice.
      What is it that you think might change?   What might it change to?

   *  In the intro:
        > Furthermore, typed rdf:text literals that are semantically
                                               ^^^^  remove


Great work, guys.

   -- Sandro

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:16:26 UTC