W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-text@w3.org > October to December 2008

One more minor thing before going to 1st WD from my side...

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:37:48 +0000
Message-ID: <491B84EC.8080300@deri.org>
To: public-rdf-text@w3.org

...
Shall we change the section heading

== Functions and Operators on  <tt>rdf:text</tt> ==

to

== Functions on  <tt>rdf:text</tt> ==

?

we don't define any operators, after I have removed "equal"

best,
Axel

Axel Polleres wrote:
> Added both. (sent a message confirming this earlier already, but not 
> sure whether it got through, had some mail problem)
> 
> Jos de Bruijn wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I propose to add the following two editor's notes to the rdf:text
>> document so that the document can be published before resolving the
>> issues I raised in my review of the document [1].
>>
>> To section 3, below the specification of the lexical space, add an
>> editor's note with the following text:
>>
>> The definition of the set of characters, particularly the fact that it
>> is infinite, as well as the compatibility with xml string -- whether the
>> string part of the lex & val space should be the same as xs:string --
>> are under discussion.
>>
>> To section 4.3.1 add an editor's note with the following text:
>>
>> The inclusion of text-length, as well as the definition of the function
>> -- what should be the length of an rdf:text value -- are under 
>> discussion.
>>
>>
>> Best, Jos
>>
>> [1] 
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-text/2008OctDec/0006.html
> 
> 


-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, 
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 01:38:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:42 UTC