- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:28:17 +0000
- To: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- CC: public-rdf-text@w3.org
Added both. As mentioned earlier, I see no reason to change the latter (text-length) though, the rationale being that I think that there should be a corresponding built-in for each facet. Jos de Bruijn wrote: > All, > > I propose to add the following two editor's notes to the rdf:text > document so that the document can be published before resolving the > issues I raised in my review of the document [1]. > > To section 3, below the specification of the lexical space, add an > editor's note with the following text: > > The definition of the set of characters, particularly the fact that it > is infinite, as well as the compatibility with xml string -- whether the > string part of the lex & val space should be the same as xs:string -- > are under discussion. > > To section 4.3.1 add an editor's note with the following text: > > The inclusion of text-length, as well as the definition of the function > -- what should be the length of an rdf:text value -- are under discussion. > > > Best, Jos > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-text/2008OctDec/0006.html -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2008 13:28:59 UTC