RE: review of rdf:text

> 
> This document is in good shape and is ready to be published.

A minor nit: the document has a dead reference to RFC 4646 which should be removed (the document correctly references BCP 47 instead, which is currently the same thing).

I18N Core WG would like some credit on this document as well :-). Perhaps an acknowledgement?

> 
> Important: The two characters use to delimit rdf:text values in the
> page don't
> render in my browser (firefox, windows).  I also checked explorer
> on my machine
> and they do not render there.

The two characters are both entities (⟨ and ⟩) which are U+27E8 and U+27E9 respectively. See [1]. These are fairly uncommon characters that look a lot like parentheses.

> 
> Section 3: Why aren't there parallel versions of the length
> functions for lang tags?

Length functions have no practical meaning with language tags, whereas they are a useful property of strings.

Kind Regards,

Addison


Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126
Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/

Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 16:16:45 UTC