public-rdf-star@w3.org from October 2020 by author

David Booth

• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Saturday, 31 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Are the names RDF* and SPARQL* worth the confusion? (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: use cases for RDF* (Wednesday, 14 October)

Doerthe Arndt

• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 14 October)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Moving RDF* forward (Tuesday, 13 October)

james anderson

• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Tuesday, 20 October)

Jeen Broekstra

• Re: Moving RDF* forward (Tuesday, 13 October)

Jerven Bolleman

• Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Wednesday, 28 October)

Jerven Tjalling Bolleman

• Twice married to the same person problem, was [Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity] (Friday, 30 October)
• owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Wednesday, 28 October)

Jos De Roo

• Re: how many RDF* triples? (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: how many RDF* triples? (Thursday, 15 October)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Are the names RDF* and SPARQL* worth the confusion? (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: use cases for RDF* (Wednesday, 14 October)

Martynas Jusevičius

• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Saturday, 17 October)

Olaf Hartig

• Re: Can RDF* be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: how many RDF* triples? (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: how many RDF* triples? (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: how many RDF* triples? (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: how many RDF* triples? (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: Moving RDF* forward (Wednesday, 14 October)

Patrick J Hayes

• Re: how many RDF* triples? (Wednesday, 14 October)

Pavel Klinov

• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Monday, 19 October)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: how many RDF* triples? (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 14 October)
• weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 14 October)
• use cases for RDF* (Wednesday, 14 October)
• how many RDF* triples? (Wednesday, 14 October)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Do we need referential opacity? (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Can RDF* be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: how many RDF* triples? (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: how many RDF* triples? (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Moving RDF* forward (Tuesday, 13 October)

Storm, Jonathon

• RE: Twice married to the same person problem, was [Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity] (Friday, 30 October)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: Are the names RDF* and SPARQL* worth the confusion? (Wednesday, 28 October)

thomas lörtsch

• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples (Wednesday, 21 October)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 October 2020 02:30:34 UTC