public-rdf-star@w3.org from November 2020 by author

Andy Seaborne

• RDF Star community home page (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Collecting use case and requirements. (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Tuesday, 3 November)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Some reflections on the semantics of embedded triples (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)
• Introduction (Wednesday, 25 November)

Bob DuCharme

• suggestions about "RDF* and SPARQL*" draft (Sunday, 29 November)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Weekly call (Re: Moving RDF* forward) (Friday, 13 November)

David Booth

• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)

Dörthe Arndt

• Re: Some reflections on the semantics of embedded triples (Monday, 30 November)

Florent Georges

• Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27 (Thursday, 26 November)

Ghislain ATEMEZING

• Re: First version of a test suite for RDF* (Monday, 23 November)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: First version of a test suite for RDF* (Monday, 23 November)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Minutes of today's call (Saturday, 14 November)

james anderson

• "embedded predicate triples" (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)

Jerven Tjalling Bolleman

• Action point: discussing contra use case against referential opacity (Saturday, 14 November)

Jos De Roo

• Re: First version of a test suite for RDF* (Tuesday, 24 November)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)

Martynas Jusevičius

• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Sunday, 29 November)

Miel Vander Sande

• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Monday, 2 November)

Olaf Hartig

• Evaluation semantics of BGP* and BIND*/FIND added to the draft spec (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Wednesday, 18 November)

Patrick J Hayes

• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Tuesday, 10 November)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: Some reflections on the semantics of embedded triples (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: First version of a test suite for RDF* (Monday, 30 November)
• RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Sunday, 29 November)
• Re: First version of a test suite for RDF* (Sunday, 29 November)
• making the test suite results meaningful (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27 (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27 (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*) (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*) (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*) (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: First version of a test suite for RDF* (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Action point: discussing contra use case against referential opacity (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Monday, 2 November)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: First version of a test suite for RDF* (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27 (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27 (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27 (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27 (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27 (Thursday, 26 November)
• Agenda for 2020-11-27 (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*) (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*) (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: First version of a test suite for RDF* (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*) (Tuesday, 24 November)
• RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*) (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: First version of a test suite for RDF* (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: First version of a test suite for RDF* (Monday, 23 November)
• First version of a test suite for RDF* (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: Agenda for 2020-11-20 (Friday, 20 November)
• Agenda for 2020-11-20 (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Action point: discussing contra use case against referential opacity (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Referential opacity: current state of affairs (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: Minutes of today's call (Monday, 16 November)
• Minutes of today's call (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: Weekly call (Re: Moving RDF* forward) (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Weekly call (Re: Moving RDF* forward) (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: Twice married to the same person problem, was [Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity] (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Monday, 2 November)
• Weekly call (Re: Moving RDF* forward) (Monday, 2 November)

Storm, Jonathon

• RE: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)

thomas lörtsch

• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Sunday, 22 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Saturday, 21 November)
• Naming conventions [was: Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)] (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) (Tuesday, 3 November)

Last message date: Monday, 30 November 2020 19:39:08 UTC