public-rdf-star@w3.org from September 2019 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: Extending RDF stores to support RDF*/PG versus RDF*/SA (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What arethepossibilities? (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Tuesday, 3 September)

David Booth

• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Thursday, 19 September)

Doerthe Arndt

• Re: RDF* semantics (Thursday, 26 September)

Ghislain Atemezing

• Re: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What arethepossibilities? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What arethepossibilities? (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What arethepossibilities? (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What are thepossibilities? (Monday, 2 September)

Jeen Broekstra

• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Thursday, 19 September)

Jem Rayfield

• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Friday, 20 September)

Jerven Bolleman

• Can SA be extension of RDF+reification? [was Re: PG mode and SA mode] (Wednesday, 25 September)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: RDF* semantics (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Monday, 2 September)

Marco Neumann

• Re: RDF* semantics (Monday, 2 September)

Martynas Jusevičius

• Re: do Property Graphs always assert annotated arcs? (Thursday, 19 September)

Miel Vander Sande (UGent-imec)

• Re: do Property Graphs always assert annotated arcs? (Monday, 23 September)

Olaf Hartig

• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: do Property Graphs always assert annotated arcs? (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: do Property Graphs always assert annotated arcs? (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: do Property Graphs always assert annotated arcs? (Thursday, 19 September)
• PG mode and SA mode (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What arethepossibilities? (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What arethepossibilities? (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What are thepossibilities? (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What are the possibilities? (Sunday, 1 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Sunday, 1 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Sunday, 1 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Sunday, 1 September)

Patrick J Hayes

• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Wednesday, 18 September)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: do Property Graphs always assert annotated arcs? (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: do Property Graphs always assert annotated arcs? (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Monday, 2 September)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: Can SA be extension of RDF+reification? [was Re: PG mode and SA mode] (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Monday, 23 September)
• Extending RDF stores to support RDF*/PG versus RDF*/SA (Saturday, 21 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Monday, 2 September)
• Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Sunday, 1 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Sunday, 1 September)

Steve sarsfield

• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: PG mode and SA mode (Sunday, 22 September)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Wednesday, 4 September)

thomas lörtsch

• Re: RDF* semantics (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: RDF*/SPARQL* syntax (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Monday, 2 September)

William Waites

• Re: RDF* semantics (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: RDF* semantics (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: Why does RDF* allow triples as objects? (Sunday, 1 September)

Last message date: Thursday, 26 September 2019 19:13:22 UTC