- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:31:18 +1000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
If I understand your issue correctly, you are pointing out that such hands may have other values in addition to the 5 expected ones, while the description of the example was stating "... must have 5 values"? If that's all, I have added "... must have *at least* 5 values". If there is anything else here please clarify and point at specific sentences that are misleading. https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/a315a25c32e1cd21b36f21efa7d6799dd0a9f2e7 BTW your example doesn't work at all since you have used sh:digit instead of ex:digit, but I have assumed the latter. Holger On 16/03/2017 1:07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > The example shapes graph using of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint does not > correspond to its textual description. The following data graph conforms to > the shapes graph but does not match the textual description because it > contains a hand that has seven digits and where its fingers and thumbs are > not disjoint. A correct example is needed to justify the inclusion of > sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint in SHACL. > > ex:SixFingerHand rdf:type ex:Hand ; > sh:digit [ rdf:type ex:Thumb ] ; > sh:digit [ rdf:type ex:Finger ] ; > sh:digit [ rdf:type ex:Finger ] ; > sh:digit [ rdf:type ex:Finger ] ; > sh:digit [ rdf:type ex:Finger ] ; > sh:digit [ rdf:type ex:Finger, ex:Thumb ] ; > sh:digit [ ] . > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Nuance Communications >
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 00:31:56 UTC