- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:04:55 -0700
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
I think that this is quite different. The external OWL 2 repository is a place for test cases, but is unofficial and separate from the official test suite, with no W3C status. If this repository disappears then nothing should change about OWL. The SHACL test cases are official. The owner of datashapes.org may want to prohibit its use in the test cases in the future, which could be problematic for SHACL. peter On 04/13/2017 09:14 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > I'm not sure there's a problem with it. I observe > https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-conformance/#References has: > > > 7 References > > [Contributed Test Cases] > Public Test Case Repository > <http://owl.semanticweb.org/page/OWL_2_Test_Cases>. > > which is http://owl.semanticweb.org/page/OWL_2_Test_Cases > > However, I also think it'd be fine to change. Maybe > http://www.w3.org/2017/shacl/test/* ? > > What that be good? > > -- Sandro > > > On 04/13/2017 10:19 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> The SHACL test cases use datashapes.org. Is it appropriate for a W3C test >> suite to use a third-party domain? >> >> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >> Nuance Communications >> >
Received on Thursday, 13 April 2017 21:05:30 UTC