public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from November 2016 by thread

why retain sh:predicate in property constraints? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 29 November)

a problem with shapes and constraints Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 29 November)

read-through of Sections 5 and 7 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Saturday, 26 November)

• Re: read-through of Sections 5 and 7 Karen Coyle (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: read-through of Sections 5 and 7 (response to section 5) Holger Knublauch (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: read-through of Sections 5 and 7 (response to section 7) Holger Knublauch (Monday, 28 November)

editorial comment on https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/ff393869ede0843fd9135542c4da7f61e500d1b1?diff=split Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 22 November)

• Re: editorial comment on https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/ff393869ede0843fd9135542c4da7f61e500d1b1?diff=split Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 22 November)

Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 22 November)

• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155 Irene Polikoff (Tuesday, 22 November)
  • Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155 Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 22 November)

incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 22 November)

• Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 22 November)
  • Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 22 November)
    • Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components Karen Coyle (Wednesday, 23 November)
      • Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 23 November)
      • Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components Irene Polikoff (Wednesday, 23 November)

Using SHACL at the Europeana Foundation to validate EDM Hugo Manguinhas (Tuesday, 22 November)

test suite data structures Eric Prud'hommeaux (Tuesday, 22 November)

undocumented changes to SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 22 November)

• Re: undocumented changes to SHACL Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 23 November)

on ISSUE-196 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 22 November)

Re: $this in Aggregations Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 22 November)

• Re: $this in Aggregations Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 22 November)

Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] Dimitris Kontokostas (Monday, 21 November)

• Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 21 November)
  • Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] Dimitris Kontokostas (Monday, 21 November)
    • Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] Irene Polikoff (Tuesday, 22 November)

Re: on property paths in SHACL Dimitris Kontokostas (Monday, 21 November)

• Re: on property paths in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 21 November)
  • Re: on property paths in SHACL Dimitris Kontokostas (Monday, 28 November)
    • Re: on property paths in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 28 November)

eliminating property constraints Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Saturday, 19 November)

• Re: eliminating property constraints Karen Coyle (Sunday, 20 November)
  • Re: eliminating property constraints Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 22 November)
    • Re: eliminating property constraints Karen Coyle (Tuesday, 22 November)

two interesting test cases for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 14 November)

• Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL Holger Knublauch (Monday, 14 November)
  • Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 14 November)
    • Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL Holger Knublauch (Monday, 14 November)
      • Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 15 November)
        • Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 15 November)
          • Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 15 November)
            • Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 15 November)
          • Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 15 November)
            • Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 15 November)
            • Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 15 November)

on removing pre-binding from the core of SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Saturday, 12 November)

• Re: on removing pre-binding from the core of SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Saturday, 12 November)
• Re: on removing pre-binding from the core of SHACL Karen Coyle (Sunday, 13 November)

some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 11 November)

• Re: some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November Karen Coyle (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November Holger Knublauch (Monday, 14 November)
  • Re: some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 17 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:13:30 UTC