- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:18:52 -0700
- To: hellekin <hellekin@cepheide.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-ruby@w3.org
On Mar 18, 2014, at 7:00 PM, hellekin <hellekin@cepheide.org> wrote: > On 03/18/2014 09:52 PM, cr wrote: >> >> foaf-ssl, from hellekin was all i could find related - if there are others, maybe they are hiding. a few thoughts >> > *** Yes, I have some long due upgrade to do there... Contributions > welcome. I didn't touch anything related to Ruby in many months. And > I'm way into systems these days, not so much Web. > >> >> - uses RDF::Raptor >> > *** Should use LinkedData instead, which provides a wrapper to all > flavors of RDF engines. > >> - GPL >> > *** GPL is a free license for free software developers. It prevents > takeover by proprietary developers and thus protect the users better. > That said, as foafssl is supposed to be integrated with the Ruby RDF > suite, it should use the same license (which I don't like too much, as > it does not favor the commons). How, exactly, dos UNLICENCE not favor the commons? >> - ruby-specific API for querying. stuff like <https://github.com/hellekin/foafssl-ruby/blob/master/lib/foafssl/reader/foaf.rb> >> > *** Using the LinkedData gem would fix this. Check the issues for > foafssl on Github. +1 or rack-linkeddata, which does more. Gregg > == > hk >
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 02:19:23 UTC