W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-ruby@w3.org > April 2010

raptor

From: carmen <_@whats-your.name>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 00:41:41 +0000
To: public-rdf-ruby@w3.org
Message-ID: <20100405004141.GA3553@x200.Belkin>
main issue is the name. RDF as a prefix sounds pretty canonical, like the officially 'approved' library

surely the officially approved way to use Raptor wouldnt entail parsing and serializing 3 times instead of one due to a design choice.

when someone comes along and writes RDF-Raptor (as opposed to RDF-Rapper) say using redlead or dajobe's bindings, what will they name it?
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 00:42:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 April 2010 00:42:37 GMT