W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-prov@w3.org > October 2011

Re: complete graphs

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:55:56 +0100
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Ian Davis <Ian.Davis@talis.com>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, public-rdf-prov@w3.org, Peter Buneman <opb@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <140D25DC-9C85-4DDE-AC0D-7C4221579B5B@cyganiak.de>
To: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
On 4 Oct 2011, at 12:03, William Waites wrote:
> What if we *did* have names for assertions? We could construct graphs
> (collections of assertions) using these names... If we interpreted the
> fourth column in this way, what would happen?

There was a looong conversation between me an Bob Ferris on public-rdf-comments about exactly this question, starting here:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2011Sep/0005.html

You might want to read it and let us know if you reach a different conclusion

Best,
Richard
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 15:56:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 October 2011 15:56:29 GMT