Re: complete graphs

On 04/10/11 12:03, William Waites wrote:
>>>>>> "phayes" == Pat Hayes<phayes@ihmc.us>  writes:
>
>      phayes>  I dont think we have names for assertions. An assertion is a
>      phayes>  speech act, not a graph.
>
> [wielding can opener]
>
> What if we *did* have names for assertions? We could construct graphs
> (collections of assertions) using these names... If we interpreted the
> fourth column in this way, what would happen?

Reification.

	Andy

>
> Cheers,
> -w
>

Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 11:06:27 UTC