W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2010

potential grammatical error(s) in latest draft

From: Wayne Smith <wayne.smith@csun.edu>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 14:22:29 -0800
Message-ID: <4B92D5A5.8020304@csun.edu>
To: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Colleagues,

With respect to the latest HTML+RDFa draft at:

	http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-in-html-20100304/

I believe there are two grammatical errors (both of the same type).

1.
Section 6 (Infoset-based Processors)

"While the intent of the RDFa processing instructions were to provide a 
set of rules that are as language and toolchain agnostic as possible, 
for the sake of clarity, detailed methods of extracting RDFa content 
from processors operating on an XML Information Set are provided below."

In this sentence, I proffer that "...were..." should be "...is..." (or 
possibly, but less likely, "...was...").  Specifically, the tense of the 
"to be" (copula) verb refers to the (singular) tense of the noun that is 
the subject of the main clause ("...intent...") rather than the (plural) 
tense of the noun in the prepositional clause ("...of the RDFa 
processing instructions...").

2.
Section 7 (DOM Level 2-based Processors)

"While the intent of the RDFa processing instructions were to provide a 
set of rules that are as language and toolchain agnostic as possible, 
for the sake of clarity, detailed methods of extracting RDFa content 
from processors operating in a DOM2 environment are provided below."

ibid. (same issue)

Best,

Wayne Smith
Received on Saturday, 6 March 2010 22:23:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 6 March 2010 22:23:03 GMT