- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:09:34 -0500
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On 01/29/2010 09:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > Thus, I think both HTML Microdata and HTML+RDFa should simply > say: "The publication of this document by the W3C as a W3C Working Draft > does not imply endorsement by the W3C HTML Working Group or the W3C as a > whole." Done. > I think likewise the corresponding sentence in HTML+RDFa should cite > joint development with the RDFa Task Force rather than claiming external > development. There has been much technical feedback in the HTML WG on > that draft as well. Done. > Paul Cotton wrote: > Given that we are about to publish a separate W3C WD for Microdata > [see http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/], I would like to suggest that this > link be changed to point to that separate W3C WD. I expect that this > kind of change will have to be made later in the publication process > when the link to the Microdata FPWD on the TR page is finalized. Changed. The [microdata] link points to the following URL now: http://www.w3.org/TR/microdata/ While this link doesn't exist right now, I'm expecting the short-name that is chosen to be "microdata". If it ends up being something different, we were going to have to change the link at the time of publication anyway. The new HTML+RDFa draft is available here: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/ Diffs are here: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/diffs/rdfa-diff-20091015-20100115.html -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Monarch - Next Generation REST Web Services http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/12/14/monarch/
Received on Sunday, 31 January 2010 05:10:03 UTC