Re: Allowed values in prefixes

Thanks, Shane.

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:50:10 -0600
> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
> Cc: RDFa TF list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Allowed values in prefixes
> 
> The reference to the old xmlns spec was an error.  We should errata that
> we are referencing the current xmlns spec.
> 
> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>> All,
>> 
>> We just had a discussion on IRC [1] re allowed values in prefixes. Seems
>> that we have referenced the 'old', 1999 XMLNS spec in our syntax, that is
>> [2] points to [3]:
>> 
>> NCName  ::= (Letter <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-Letter>  | '_')
>> (NCNameChar)*
>> 
>> And further 'Letter' points to the latest version (from 2008) [4] (as it
>> doesn't use a dated URI but the latest version of the XML spec).
>> 
>> I honestly dunno what to advise people here and/or if we'd need to change
>> anything - happy to hear what others think.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>       Michael
>> 
>> [1] http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2010-01-27.html#T11-21-25
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/#NT-NCName
>> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-Letter
>> 
>>   
> 
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 15:13:36 UTC