W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2010

Re: CURIEs and blank nodes (Test #140)

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:05:55 -0600
Message-ID: <4B7187E3.8030409@aptest.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>


Dan Connolly wrote:
> No, it doesn't. See section 6.4 RDF URI References
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-Graph-URIref
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#dfn-URI-reference
>
> Note that the 2004 RDF specs use "URI reference" in order to
> include #fragments, which were not part of URIs in the URI spec
> at the time (RFC2396). The current URI standard (RFC3986)
> includes #fragments in URIs.
Hmmm...  if we want to get technical, the RDFa Syntax Specification is 
based upon XHTML Modularization, and brings in its datatype definitions 
from there.  URI in XHTML Modularization is defined as the XML Schema 
datatype anyURI [1] [2].  It was my impression that anyURI permitted 
IRIs.  Steven?  This was your thing.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstraction.html#dt_URI
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#anyURI

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 16:06:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 9 February 2010 16:06:49 GMT