W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2010

Re: @datatype and rdf:XMLLiteral

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:15:41 +0000
Message-ID: <640dd5061002032315x22584453r6830ba92847c5bb4@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Yes, it should be in the sense of an expanded name. Good idea to add a TC.

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> in step 9 of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_5.5. I see:
>
> "@datatype is present, and does not have an empty value, and is not set
> to rdf:XMLLiteral."
>
> Is "set to" used in the sense of string literals or expanded names?
>
> suppose I bind xyz: to the RDF namespace and use
>  datatype="xyz:XMLLiteral"
>
> Does that count?
>
> Is there a relevant test case? if not, please add one.
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2010 07:16:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 4 February 2010 07:16:18 GMT