W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:32:16 +0300
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4066BBD5-5BCA-46CF-B6A1-A10AC7CBEF95@iki.fi>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:05, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> ...
>> (For clarity: DOM Level 1 isn't a tree model that completely,  
>> correctly and exclusively reflects the XML Information Set.)
>> ...
>
> Does DOM Level 2? I didn't think so, but it may depend on what you  
> mean by "completely, correctly, and exclusively".


No. I tried to contrast XOM (the most correct XML tree model that I'm  
aware of and that happens to also be an existing target model of an  
existing HTML parsing algorithm implementation) and DOM Level 1 (the  
model most preferred by the RDFa TF). I deliberately avoided  
discussing DOM Level 2 in my clarification of the issues, because DOM  
Level 2 doesn't clarify the point I'm trying to make as clearly as XOM  
even though it relates to the point I'm trying to make.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 08:32:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 September 2009 08:32:59 GMT