W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2009

Re: My first RDFa Web example (products)

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:28:09 +0100
Message-ID: <640dd5060909181628k663d4b97xd63ff8829732cefa@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Evan Goer <goer@yahoo-inc.com>, RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Shane,

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
>
>
> Mark Birbeck wrote:
>
> And finally, if you also wanted to return JSON, why not still use
> EARL, but use RDFj to give you 'semantic JSON'?:
>
>   <http://code.google.com/p/ubiquity-rdfa/wiki/Rdfj>
>
>
> Actually.... why not return what the requestor asks for in the HTTP-ACCEPT
> header?  I want application/xhtml+xml - ok.  I want JSON - ok.  I want EARL
> (must be a way to indicate that) - ok.

That's what I'm saying. :)

EARL is an RDF format.

So I'm suggesting that if it's returned as RDFa, it is directly
readable, without having to process it.

Regards,

Mark

-- 
Mark Birbeck, webBackplane

mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com

http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck

webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number
05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street,
London, EC2A 4RR)
Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 23:28:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 September 2009 23:28:54 GMT