W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:03:24 +0100
Message-ID: <C6CFC2DC.83FE%michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>, "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, "RDFa TF list" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>

> Nothing specific, only my own thoughts at the moment:-(. Personally I am
> very wary of reopening RDF Core as a whole. Touching a stable foundation
> like RDF is dangerous, even if it is not perfect... My ideal would be to
> have the named graphs (others would call it graph literals...) taken out
> and concentrate on them only in terms of standardization...

I see. And I understand ;)

Well then: let's do it!

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
> Organization: World Wide Web Consortium
> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:59:15 +0200
> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
> Cc: Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>, Mark Birbeck
> <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, RDFa TF list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>,
> Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
> Subject: Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with
> respect to attributes that have no legal value
> 
> 
> 
> Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, at least at the moment, there is no formal specification
>>> for named graphs.
>> 
>> Agree. And almost everyone I know agrees as well that this should be fixed
>> in an updated RDF core (that is, model) in the very near future. Any plans?
>> 
> 
> Nothing specific, only my own thoughts at the moment:-(. Personally I am
> very wary of reopening RDF Core as a whole. Touching a stable foundation
> like RDF is dangerous, even if it is not perfect... My ideal would be to
> have the named graphs (others would call it graph literals...) taken out
> and concentrate on them only in terms of standardization...
> 
> Ivan
> 
>> Cheers,
>>       Michael
>> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf



Received on Friday, 11 September 2009 08:04:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 11 September 2009 08:04:06 GMT