Yes, something like that. One could say <blabla role="Collection"> </blabla> with the immediate descendents of <blabla> playing the same role as the <li>-s in the case of <ul>/<ol>. Or use the @role for those elements as well to make things explicit. Ivan Toby Inkster wrote: > On 7 Sep 2009, at 10:00, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> This approach is not optimal either, because it is really bound to the >> specifics of HTML. > > > Maybe @role could help out here. > > <ul> and <ol> trigger the rdf:List behaviour, but if you want to use a > different HTML element (e.g. <div>), or are using a markup language > other than HTML, then you can force rdf:List behaviour via @role. > > <list xmlns:xhv="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#" > about="#mylist" > role="xhv:list"> > ... > </list> > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 September 2009 10:35:02 GMT