Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML

Shelley Powers wrote:
> 
> I can agree that snarkiness should occur elsewhere. But I still believe 
> that those who issue the snarky comments should also follow up with 
> direct and specific responses to those who are the target of their 
> snarkiness. The response does not have to be friendly, but it should 
> address what is their real concern, honestly, and yes, even bluntly if 
> necessary .

+1

The only thing I will add is that I don't feel that people should feel 
compelled to either repeat themselves, or to simply echo the comments of 
others.

Ian, Philip, and myself have raised a number of issues that are in the 
process of being worked but have not been resolved.  If anybody has 
*additional* concerns that have not previously been expressed, I would 
encourage them to come forward with these concerns, honestly, and yes, 
even bluntly, if necessary.

- Sam Ruby