Re: Suggested test case 0124

I remember we had long discussions whether a literal is normalized or
not, and we decided that we should not (I remember Steven's argument on
typing poetry...)

Ivan

Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> Ivan,
> 
>> Isn't that correct?
> 
> Hm. Well, my reading of the processing rules [1], step 9, is that, if
> 
> 'the body of the [current element] does have non-text child nodes but
> @datatype is present, with an empty value.'
> 
> then the [current object literal] should be a plain literal, where
> 
> '... The actual literal is either the value of @content (if present) or a
> string created by concatenating the text content of each of the descendant
> elements of the [current element] in document order.'
> 
> which would support your argument.
> 
> Mark? Shane?
> 
> Cheers,
>       Michael
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_5.5.

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf