W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2009

Re: [whatwg] Link rot is not dangerous

From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 22:27:03 +0100
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, whatwg@whatwg.org, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <24FFB4C0-6D3F-4217-BBE1-E6C89FBD0C80@googlemail.com>
To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>

On 15 May 2009, at 18:25, Shelley Powers wrote:

> One of the very first uses of RDF, in RSS 1.0, for feeds, is still  
> in existence, still viable. You don't have to take my word, check it  
> out yourselves:
>
> http://purl.org/rss/1.0/

Who actually treats RSS 1.0 as RDF? Every major feed reader just uses  
a generic XML parser for it (quite frequently a non-namespace aware  
one) and just totally ignores any RDF-ness of it.


--
Geoffrey Sneddon
<http://gsnedders.com/>
<http://simplepie.org/>
Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 21:27:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 May 2009 21:27:52 GMT